Roman Cavalry
For the Roman cavalry, did each person have multiple horses like what the nomads have, or did the Romans only have one horse for one cavalryman?
And if you can, please do provide some sources.
Thank you
I am looking at the time period between 0 to 220 A.D.Bede wrote:
I think you will have to specify the period to get an answer. The early Republican cavalry was organised differently from the more professional cavalry of later times. Late Roman armies were different again.
Karen R. Dixon and Pat Southern, The Roman Cavalry, 1992, (1997 paperback, Routledge).
Ann Hyland, Training the Roman Cavalry [From Arrian's Ars Tactica], 1993, Grange Books.
A soldier was responsible for his horse and in the period you mentioned there was a standard value of 125 denarii deducted for the horse from his pay. There are records surviving from Dura Europos such as "Malchus Gora amisit equum" which means MG lost his horse. There were also laws preventing the export of military horses from the province.
I hope this helps. The book is full of references to original documents.
Thanks Bede. So, this basically applies to all period before the fall of the Western Roman Empire, right?Bede wrote:
I have just had a quick read through The Roman Cavalry. In Chapter 9, Military Records and the Supply of Horses, it is noted that there was only one horse supplied per cavalryman and that sometimes there were not enough horses to go round.
A soldier was responsible for his horse and in the period you mentioned there was a standard value of 125 denarii deducted for the horse from his pay. There are records surviving from Dura Europos such as "Malchus Gora amisit equum" which means MG lost his horse. There were also laws preventing the export of military horses from the province.
I hope this helps. The book is full of references to original documents.