ATARNarchive

If only!

6 posts2006live thread
jack farrell
Jon; Yes! if only. My own attempts to have world-class interpreters agree on the meaning of single passages of Persian caligraphy have led to wildly dissimilar translations.
jonR
Jack,
I'm sure these scripts are a lot like medieval French. You have a room full of learned scholars sitting around arguing for hours over the interpretation/translation of each word.
There is soooo much information out there that never gets read or published. Tis' a crying shame right! :(
JonR
Thomas Duvernay
The manufacturer warrants the bow against defects in materials and workmanship. Any misuse or alterations will void the warranty.

:lol:

Just joking...
jonR
LOL :lol:
Bede
The bows illustrate the four types of composite bows common in Mughal India. The top left hand one is a Chahar Kham bow (four-curved bow) or as we call it a Sind bow. The others are regional types.

The problems with these texts are not insurmountable. The major difficulties are technical terms that are no longer used and poor copying by scribes who did not understand the content of what they were writing.

Edward McEwen has published several articles related to Indian books written in Farsi.